Overview & philosophy
Integrations fail quietly when nobody owns reconciliation, rollback, and who is allowed to change production mappings. Jordan’s default is to make those boring topics explicit—because boring is what keeps CFOs and auditors calm.
She has shipped programs across Dynamics, SharePoint, and custom middleware where the hardest part was not the HTTP call but the business rules when two systems disagree on a customer ID. Her deliverables usually include living diagrams, decision logs, and test data that mirror production cardinality—not toy datasets.
She prefers incremental cutovers with measurable checkpoints over “big bang” weekends, unless risk analysis genuinely supports a single window—and then she still insists on dry runs.
“Jordan turned our integration workshop from a blame session into a backlog we could actually estimate.” — IT director, regulated services (anonymized)
Technical depth
Depth areas for enterprise Microsoft ecosystems and the .NET glue that connects them.
Dynamics & Dataverse
SharePoint & Graph
Azure integration platform
- Azure Functions and Logic Apps where low-code accelerates—but with source control and peer review.
- Service Bus for ordered workflows; dead-letter handling and replay procedures documented.
- Key Vault, managed identities, and network constraints aligned with your security baseline.
Tools & platforms (representative)
Representative program types
Illustrative integration programs—names anonymized; substance reflects typical enterprise complexity.
CRM ↔ ERP sync
Bidirectional customer and order sync with conflict rules, nightly reconciliation, and executive-friendly exception dashboards.
Document lifecycle
SharePoint as system of record with .NET services for approvals, redaction hooks, and archival to cheaper storage tiers.
Vendor onboarding
Secure B2B APIs, partner-specific schemas, and certificate rotation playbooks with clear ownership.
Engagement models
Jordan can lead cross-vendor programs or execute as a senior IC on a defined slice—scope and RACI are clarified up front.
| Model | Minimum | Best when… |
|---|---|---|
| Integration program lead | Multi-quarter | Multiple systems, vendors, and compliance gates need one accountable technical thread. |
| Delivery IC | Project-based | Architecture is agreed; you need senior build + hardening + documentation. |
| Readiness advisory | Short intensive | You need a cutover readiness review, risk register, and test plan before a fixed date. |
Systems, owners, data classes, and batch vs. real-time needs captured in a living document.
Thin slices across boundaries with auth, volume, and failure injection on staging.
Checklist-driven go-live, war-room support window, and steady-state handover with escalation matrix.
Ways of working with your team
Business stakeholders: Jordan translates technical constraints into decision options (“cheaper now / riskier later”) instead of binary blockers.
IT & security: She produces app registration requests, data-flow diagrams, and retention notes suitable for review boards—not informal Slack threads.
Vendors: She keeps third parties aligned to shared milestones and test evidence, reducing “not our problem” gaps at cutover.
Bring your current integration map (even if messy), top 5 failure scenarios, and any compliance constraints—Jordan will turn that into a sequenced plan in the first engagement week.
Fit, boundaries & quick answers
- • Integrate Microsoft LOB stacks with bespoke .NET services.
- • Need workshops, documentation, and governed releases—not heroics.
- • Have compliance or IT gates that require traceable change control.
- • Need deep SAP functional consulting without Microsoft integration surfaces.
- • Expect same-week full ERP replacement without discovery.
- • Program has no executive sponsor for cross-team decisions.
Does Jordan manage the project plan?
She can co-own milestones with your PMO or lead technical workstreams—RACI is agreed in the SOW.
Can she work with offshore SI partners?
Yes, with clear interfaces: API contracts, test evidence expectations, and shared defect triage.
What does “hypercare” include?
A defined window after go-live with agreed hours, escalation paths, and exit criteria— not open-ended free support.
Engage Jordan for your next integration wave
Share system inventory, compliance notes, and target dates—we’ll respond with sequencing and resourcing.